MEGA UDPOS

Universal Dependencies POS tagging as part of the MEGA benchmark suite. A multilingual part-of-speech tagging dataset based on Universal Dependencies treebanks, utilizing the universal POS tag set of 17 tags across 38 diverse languages from different language families. Used for evaluating multilingual POS tagging systems.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct from Microsoft currently leads the MEGA UDPOS leaderboard with a score of 0.604 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MicrosoftPhi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 60.4%, followed by MicrosoftPhi-3.5-mini-instruct at 46.5%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MEGA UDPOS

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MEGA UDPOS Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
160B
24B128K$0.10 / $0.10
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MEGA UDPOS.

What is the MEGA UDPOS benchmark?

Universal Dependencies POS tagging as part of the MEGA benchmark suite. A multilingual part-of-speech tagging dataset based on Universal Dependencies treebanks, utilizing the universal POS tag set of 17 tags across 38 diverse languages from different language families. Used for evaluating multilingual POS tagging systems.

What is the MEGA UDPOS leaderboard?

The MEGA UDPOS leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct by Microsoft leads with a score of 0.604. The average score across all models is 0.534.

What is the highest MEGA UDPOS score?

The highest MEGA UDPOS score is 0.604, achieved by Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct from Microsoft.

How many models are evaluated on MEGA UDPOS?

2 models have been evaluated on the MEGA UDPOS benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MEGA UDPOS paper?

The MEGA UDPOS paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10643. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MEGA UDPOS cover?

MEGA UDPOS is categorized under language. The benchmark evaluates text models with multilingual support.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all language
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

language
119 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

language
99 models
MMLU-Redux

An improved version of the MMLU benchmark featuring manually re-annotated questions to identify and correct errors in the original dataset. Provides more reliable evaluation metrics for language models by addressing dataset quality issues found in the original MMLU.

language
45 models
MMMLU

Multilingual Massive Multitask Language Understanding dataset released by OpenAI, featuring professionally translated MMLU test questions across 14 languages including Arabic, Bengali, German, Spanish, French, Hindi, Indonesian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Swahili, Yoruba, and Chinese. Contains approximately 15,908 multiple-choice questions per language covering 57 subjects.

language
45 models
MMLU-ProX

Extended version of MMLU-Pro providing additional challenging multiple-choice questions for evaluating language models across diverse academic and professional domains. Built on the foundation of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark framework.

language
29 models
BIG-Bench Hard

BIG-Bench Hard (BBH) is a subset of 23 challenging BIG-Bench tasks selected because prior language model evaluations did not outperform average human-rater performance. The benchmark contains 6,511 evaluation examples testing various forms of multi-step reasoning including arithmetic, logical reasoning (Boolean expressions, logical deduction), geometric reasoning, temporal reasoning, and language understanding. Tasks require capabilities such as causal judgment, object counting, navigation, pattern recognition, and complex problem solving.

language
21 models