MIABench

MIABench evaluates multimodal instruction alignment and following capabilities.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the MIABench leaderboard with a score of 0.927 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MIABench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MIABench Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
236B262K$0.45 / $3.49
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MIABench.

What is the MIABench benchmark?

MIABench evaluates multimodal instruction alignment and following capabilities.

What is the MIABench leaderboard?

The MIABench leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.927. The average score across all models is 0.927.

What is the highest MIABench score?

The highest MIABench score is 0.927, achieved by Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on MIABench?

1 models have been evaluated on the MIABench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does MIABench cover?

MIABench is categorized under instruction following, multimodal, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all instruction following
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
74 models
IFEval

Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints

instruction following
63 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

multimodalmultimodal
62 models
MMMU-Pro

A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.

multimodalmultimodal
47 models
MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

multimodalmultimodal
36 models
CharXiv-R

CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.

multimodalmultimodal
34 models