MIABench
MIABench evaluates multimodal instruction alignment and following capabilities.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the MIABench leaderboard with a score of 0.927 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads with 0.9%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MIABench
MIABench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.45 / $3.49 |
FAQ
Common questions about MIABench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.