MLE-Bench Lite

MLE-Bench Lite evaluates AI agents on machine learning engineering tasks, testing their ability to build, train, and optimize ML models for Kaggle-style competitions in a lightweight evaluation format.

MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax currently leads the MLE-Bench Lite leaderboard with a score of 0.666 across 1 evaluated AI models.

MiniMaxMiniMax M2.7 leads with 66.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MLE-Bench Lite

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MLE-Bench Lite Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1205K$0.30 / $1.20
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MLE-Bench Lite.

What is the MLE-Bench Lite benchmark?

MLE-Bench Lite evaluates AI agents on machine learning engineering tasks, testing their ability to build, train, and optimize ML models for Kaggle-style competitions in a lightweight evaluation format.

What is the MLE-Bench Lite leaderboard?

The MLE-Bench Lite leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MiniMax M2.7 by MiniMax leads with a score of 0.666. The average score across all models is 0.666.

What is the highest MLE-Bench Lite score?

The highest MLE-Bench Lite score is 0.666, achieved by MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax.

How many models are evaluated on MLE-Bench Lite?

1 models have been evaluated on the MLE-Bench Lite benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does MLE-Bench Lite cover?

MLE-Bench Lite is categorized under agents and coding. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all agents
BrowseComp

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

agents
46 models
Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

agents
40 models
Terminal-Bench

Terminal-Bench is a benchmark for testing AI agents in real terminal environments. It evaluates how well agents can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities. The benchmark consists of a dataset of ~100 hand-crafted, human-verified tasks and an execution harness that connects language models to a terminal sandbox.

agents
23 models
t2-bench

t2-bench is a benchmark for evaluating agentic tool use capabilities, measuring how well models can select, sequence, and utilize tools to solve complex tasks. It tests autonomous planning and execution in multi-step scenarios.

agents
22 models
SWE-Bench Pro

SWE-Bench Pro is an advanced version of SWE-Bench that evaluates language models on complex, real-world software engineering tasks requiring extended reasoning and multi-step problem solving.

agents
21 models
Toolathlon

Tool Decathlon is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating AI agents' ability to use multiple tools across diverse task categories. It measures proficiency in tool selection, sequencing, and execution across ten different tool-use scenarios.

agents
19 models