MM IF-Eval

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MM IF-Eval

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MM IF-Eval Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
12B
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is MM IF-Eval?

A challenging multimodal instruction-following benchmark that includes both compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to input images, with comprehensive evaluation pipeline.

MM IF-Eval is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, and structured output tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.5, with the leader at 0.5.

Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for structured output leaderboards.

Current leaders

Pixtral-12B from Mistral AI currently leads the MM IF-Eval leaderboard with a score of 0.527 across 1 evaluated AI models.

1Pixtral-12BMistral AI52.7%

Source paper

Title
MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following
Authors
Shengyuan Ding, Shenxi Wu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yuhang Zang, and 6 others
Published
Abstract

The Instruction Following (IF) ability measures how well Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) understand exactly what users are telling them and whether they are doing it right. Existing multimodal instruction following training data is scarce, the benchmarks are simple with atomic instructions, and the evaluation strategies are imprecise for tasks demanding exact output constraints. To address this, we present MM-IFEngine, an effective pipeline to generate high-quality image-instruction pairs. Our MM-IFEngine pipeline yields large-scale, diverse, and high-quality training data MM-IFInstruct-23k, which is suitable for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and extended as MM-IFDPO-23k for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We further introduce MM-IFEval, a challenging and diverse multi-modal instruction-following benchmark that includes (1) both compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to the input images, and (2) a comprehensive evaluation pipeline incorporating both rule-based assessment and judge model. We conduct SFT and DPO experiments and demonstrate that fine-tuning MLLMs on MM-IFInstruct-23k and MM-IFDPO-23k achieves notable gains on various IF benchmarks, such as MM-IFEval (+10.2$\%$), MIA (+7.6$\%$), and IFEval (+12.3$\%$). We have fully open-sourced the datasets (both SFT and DPO), evaluation code and training scripts at https://github.com/SYuan03/MM-IFEngine.

FAQ

Common questions about the MM IF-Eval benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the MM IF-Eval benchmark?

A challenging multimodal instruction-following benchmark that includes both compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to input images, with comprehensive evaluation pipeline.

What is the MM IF-Eval leaderboard?

The MM IF-Eval leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Pixtral-12B by Mistral AI leads with a score of 0.527. The average score across all models is 0.527.

What is the highest MM IF-Eval score?

The highest MM IF-Eval score is 0.527, achieved by Pixtral-12B from Mistral AI.

How many models are evaluated on MM IF-Eval?

1 models have been evaluated on the MM IF-Eval benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MM IF-Eval paper?

The MM IF-Eval paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07957. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MM IF-Eval cover?

MM IF-Eval is categorized under multimodal, reasoning, and structured output. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

What is the best open-source model on MM IF-Eval?

Pixtral-12B by Mistral AI is the top-ranked open-source model on MM IF-Eval, with a score of 0.527 (rank #1).

How recent are the MM IF-Eval leaderboard results?

The MM IF-Eval leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 1 evaluated models.