MM IF-Eval
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MM IF-Eval
MM IF-Eval Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mistral AI | 12B | — | — |
What is MM IF-Eval?
A challenging multimodal instruction-following benchmark that includes both compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to input images, with comprehensive evaluation pipeline.
MM IF-Eval is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, and structured output tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.5, with the leader at 0.5.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for structured output leaderboards.
Current leaders
Pixtral-12B from Mistral AI currently leads the MM IF-Eval leaderboard with a score of 0.527 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- MM-IFEngine: Towards Multimodal Instruction Following
- Authors
- Shengyuan Ding, Shenxi Wu, Xiangyu Zhao, Yuhang Zang, and 6 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2504.07957
Abstract
The Instruction Following (IF) ability measures how well Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) understand exactly what users are telling them and whether they are doing it right. Existing multimodal instruction following training data is scarce, the benchmarks are simple with atomic instructions, and the evaluation strategies are imprecise for tasks demanding exact output constraints. To address this, we present MM-IFEngine, an effective pipeline to generate high-quality image-instruction pairs. Our MM-IFEngine pipeline yields large-scale, diverse, and high-quality training data MM-IFInstruct-23k, which is suitable for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and extended as MM-IFDPO-23k for Direct Preference Optimization (DPO). We further introduce MM-IFEval, a challenging and diverse multi-modal instruction-following benchmark that includes (1) both compose-level constraints for output responses and perception-level constraints tied to the input images, and (2) a comprehensive evaluation pipeline incorporating both rule-based assessment and judge model. We conduct SFT and DPO experiments and demonstrate that fine-tuning MLLMs on MM-IFInstruct-23k and MM-IFDPO-23k achieves notable gains on various IF benchmarks, such as MM-IFEval (+10.2$\%$), MIA (+7.6$\%$), and IFEval (+12.3$\%$). We have fully open-sourced the datasets (both SFT and DPO), evaluation code and training scripts at https://github.com/SYuan03/MM-IFEngine.
FAQ
Common questions about the MM IF-Eval benchmark and leaderboard.