MRCR

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.

Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google currently leads the MRCR leaderboard with a score of 0.930 across 7 evaluated AI models.

Paper

GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro leads with 93.0%, followed by GoogleGemini 1.5 Pro at 82.6% and GoogleGemini 1.5 Flash at 71.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MRCR

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MRCR Leaderboard

7 models
ContextCostLicense
11.0M$1.25 / $10.00
2
3
4
58B
6309B
71.0M$0.30 / $2.50
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MRCR.

What is the MRCR benchmark?

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) is a synthetic long-context reasoning task where models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs. It tests the ability to distinguish between similar requests and reason about ordering while maintaining attention across extended contexts.

What is the MRCR leaderboard?

The MRCR leaderboard ranks 7 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google leads with a score of 0.930. The average score across all models is 0.642.

What is the highest MRCR score?

The highest MRCR score is 0.930, achieved by Gemini 2.5 Pro from Google.

How many models are evaluated on MRCR?

7 models have been evaluated on the MRCR benchmark, with 0 verified results and 7 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MRCR paper?

The MRCR paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12640. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MRCR cover?

MRCR is categorized under general, long context, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

Sub-benchmarks

MRCR 128K (2-needle)

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) at 128K context length with 2 needles. Models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs, testing attention and reasoning across 128K-token contexts with 2 items to retrieve.

textMax 1

MRCR 128K (4-needle)

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) at 128K context length with 4 needles. Models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs, testing attention and reasoning across 128K-token contexts with 4 items to retrieve.

textMax 1

MRCR 128K (8-needle)

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) at 128K context length with 8 needles. Models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs, testing attention and reasoning across 128K-token contexts with 8 items to retrieve.

textMax 1

MRCR 64K (2-needle)

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) at 64K context length with 2 needles. Models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs, testing attention and reasoning across 64K-token contexts with 2 items to retrieve.

textMax 1

MRCR 64K (4-needle)

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) at 64K context length with 4 needles. Models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs, testing attention and reasoning across 64K-token contexts with 4 items to retrieve.

textMax 1

MRCR 64K (8-needle)

MRCR (Multi-Round Coreference Resolution) at 64K context length with 8 needles. Models must navigate long conversations to reproduce specific model outputs, testing attention and reasoning across 64K-token contexts with 8 items to retrieve.

textMax 1

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all general
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
108 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models