MRCR v2 (8-needle)

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MRCR v2 (8-needle)

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MRCR v2 (8-needle) Leaderboard

10 models
ContextCostLicense
11.0M$5.00 / $25.00
2
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$5.00 / $30.00
31.0M$0.25 / $1.50
4400K$0.75 / $4.50
5400K$0.20 / $1.25
61.0M$1.50 / $9.00
7
71.0M$2.50 / $15.00
91.0M$0.50 / $3.00
10
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is MRCR v2 (8-needle)?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a text benchmark evaluating models on long context, reasoning, and general tasks. LLM Stats tracks 10 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.4, with the leader at 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for long context, best AI for reasoning and best AI for general leaderboards.

Current leaders

Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic currently leads the MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard with a score of 0.760 across 10 evaluated AI models.

1Claude Opus 4.6Anthropic76.0%
2GPT-5.5OpenAI74.0%

Source paper

Title
Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries
Authors
Kiran Vodrahalli, Santiago Ontanon, Nilesh Tripuraneni, Kelvin Xu, and 20 others
Published
Abstract

We introduce Michelangelo: a minimal, synthetic, and unleaked long-context reasoning evaluation for large language models which is also easy to automatically score. This evaluation is derived via a novel, unifying framework for evaluations over arbitrarily long contexts which measure the model's ability to do more than retrieve a single piece of information from its context. The central idea of the Latent Structure Queries framework (LSQ) is to construct tasks which require a model to ``chisel away'' the irrelevant information in the context, revealing a latent structure in the context. To verify a model's understanding of this latent structure, we query the model for details of the structure. Using LSQ, we produce three diagnostic long-context evaluations across code and natural-language domains intended to provide a stronger signal of long-context language model capabilities. We perform evaluations on several state-of-the-art models and demonstrate both that a) the proposed evaluations are high-signal and b) that there is significant room for improvement in synthesizing long-context information.

FAQ

Common questions about the MRCR v2 (8-needle) benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the MRCR v2 (8-needle) benchmark?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

What is the MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard?

The MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard ranks 10 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.760. The average score across all models is 0.394.

What is the highest MRCR v2 (8-needle) score?

The highest MRCR v2 (8-needle) score is 0.760, achieved by Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on MRCR v2 (8-needle)?

10 models have been evaluated on the MRCR v2 (8-needle) benchmark, with 0 verified results and 10 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MRCR v2 (8-needle) paper?

The MRCR v2 (8-needle) paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12640. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MRCR v2 (8-needle) cover?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is categorized under long context, reasoning, and general. The benchmark evaluates text models.

Which model offers the best value on MRCR v2 (8-needle)?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic is the cheapest, at $5.00 per million input tokens with a score of 0.760.

How is MRCR v2 (8-needle) scored?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is scored using mean_similarity, reported on a 0–1 scale. Lower is better only when explicitly noted; on this leaderboard, higher scores indicate better performance.

How recent are the MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard results?

The MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 10 evaluated models.