MRCR v2 (8-needle)
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MRCR v2 (8-needle)
MRCR v2 (8-needle) Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 2 | OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $5.00 / $30.00 | ||
| 3 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.25 / $1.50 | ||
| 4 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $0.75 / $4.50 | ||
| 5 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $0.20 / $1.25 | ||
| 6 | Google | — | 1.0M | $1.50 / $9.00 | ||
| 7 | Google | — | — | — | ||
| 7 | Google | — | 1.0M | $2.50 / $15.00 | ||
| 9 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 10 | — | — | — |
What is MRCR v2 (8-needle)?
MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.
MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a text benchmark evaluating models on long context, reasoning, and general tasks. LLM Stats tracks 10 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.4, with the leader at 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for long context, best AI for reasoning and best AI for general leaderboards.
Current leaders
Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic currently leads the MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard with a score of 0.760 across 10 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- Michelangelo: Long Context Evaluations Beyond Haystacks via Latent Structure Queries
- Authors
- Kiran Vodrahalli, Santiago Ontanon, Nilesh Tripuraneni, Kelvin Xu, and 20 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2409.12640
Abstract
We introduce Michelangelo: a minimal, synthetic, and unleaked long-context reasoning evaluation for large language models which is also easy to automatically score. This evaluation is derived via a novel, unifying framework for evaluations over arbitrarily long contexts which measure the model's ability to do more than retrieve a single piece of information from its context. The central idea of the Latent Structure Queries framework (LSQ) is to construct tasks which require a model to ``chisel away'' the irrelevant information in the context, revealing a latent structure in the context. To verify a model's understanding of this latent structure, we query the model for details of the structure. Using LSQ, we produce three diagnostic long-context evaluations across code and natural-language domains intended to provide a stronger signal of long-context language model capabilities. We perform evaluations on several state-of-the-art models and demonstrate both that a) the proposed evaluations are high-signal and b) that there is significant room for improvement in synthesizing long-context information.
FAQ
Common questions about the MRCR v2 (8-needle) benchmark and leaderboard.