MRCR v2 (8-needle)

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic currently leads the MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard with a score of 0.930 across 10 evaluated AI models.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 leads with 93.0%, followed by OpenAIGPT-5.5 at 74.0% and GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite at 60.1%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MRCR v2 (8-needle)

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MRCR v2 (8-needle) Leaderboard

10 models
ContextCostLicense
11.0M$5.00 / $25.00
2
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$5.00 / $30.00
31.0M$0.25 / $1.50
4400K$0.75 / $4.50
5400K$0.20 / $1.25
61.0M$1.50 / $9.00
7
71.0M$2.50 / $15.00
91.0M$0.50 / $3.00
10
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MRCR v2 (8-needle).

What is the MRCR v2 (8-needle) benchmark?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is a variant of the Multi-Round Coreference Resolution benchmark that includes 8 needle items to retrieve from long contexts. This tests models' ability to simultaneously track and reason about multiple pieces of information across extended conversations.

What is the MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard?

The MRCR v2 (8-needle) leaderboard ranks 10 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.930. The average score across all models is 0.412.

What is the highest MRCR v2 (8-needle) score?

The highest MRCR v2 (8-needle) score is 0.930, achieved by Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on MRCR v2 (8-needle)?

10 models have been evaluated on the MRCR v2 (8-needle) benchmark, with 0 verified results and 10 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MRCR v2 (8-needle) paper?

The MRCR v2 (8-needle) paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.12640. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MRCR v2 (8-needle) cover?

MRCR v2 (8-needle) is categorized under general, long context, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all general
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models