Multipl-E HumanEval
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Multipl-E HumanEval
Multipl-E HumanEval Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 405B | — | — | |||
| 2 | 70B | — | — | |||
| 3 | 8B | — | — |
What is Multipl-E HumanEval?
MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.
Multipl-E HumanEval is a text benchmark evaluating models on language and general tasks. LLM Stats tracks 3 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.6, with the leader at 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for language and best AI for general leaderboards.
Current leaders
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct from Meta currently leads the Multipl-E HumanEval leaderboard with a score of 0.752 across 3 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- MultiPL-E: A Scalable and Extensible Approach to Benchmarking Neural Code Generation
- Authors
- Federico Cassano, John Gouwar, Daniel Nguyen, Sydney Nguyen, and 9 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2208.08227
Abstract
Large language models have demonstrated the ability to generate both natural language and programming language text. Such models open up the possibility of multi-language code generation: could code generation models generalize knowledge from one language to another? Although contemporary code generation models can generate semantically correct Python code, little is known about their abilities with other languages. We propose MultiPL-E, a system for translating unit test-driven code generation benchmarks to new languages. We create the first massively multilingual code generation benchmark by using MultiPL-E to translate two popular Python code generation benchmarks to 18 additional programming languages. We use MultiPL-E to extend the HumanEval benchmark and MBPP benchmark to 18 languages that encompass a range of programming paradigms and popularity. Using these new parallel benchmarks, we evaluate the multi-language performance of three state-of-the-art code generation models: Codex, CodeGen, and InCoder. We find that Codex matches or even exceeds its performance on Python for several other languages. The range of programming languages represented in MultiPL-E allow us to explore the impact of language frequency and language features on model performance. Finally, the MultiPL-E approach of compiling code generation benchmarks to new programming languages is both scalable and extensible, making it straightforward to evaluate new models, benchmarks, and languages.
FAQ
Common questions about the Multipl-E HumanEval benchmark and leaderboard.