Multipl-E HumanEval

MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct from Meta currently leads the Multipl-E HumanEval leaderboard with a score of 0.752 across 3 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MetaLlama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 75.2%, followed by MetaLlama 3.1 70B Instruct at 65.5% and MetaLlama 3.1 8B Instruct at 50.8%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Multipl-E HumanEval

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

Multipl-E HumanEval Leaderboard

3 models
ContextCostLicense
1405B
270B
38B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about Multipl-E HumanEval.

What is the Multipl-E HumanEval benchmark?

MultiPL-E is a scalable and extensible approach to benchmarking neural code generation that translates unit test-driven code generation benchmarks across multiple programming languages. It extends the HumanEval benchmark to 18 additional programming languages, enabling evaluation of code generation models across diverse programming paradigms and providing insights into how models generalize programming knowledge across language boundaries.

What is the Multipl-E HumanEval leaderboard?

The Multipl-E HumanEval leaderboard ranks 3 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct by Meta leads with a score of 0.752. The average score across all models is 0.638.

What is the highest Multipl-E HumanEval score?

The highest Multipl-E HumanEval score is 0.752, achieved by Llama 3.1 405B Instruct from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on Multipl-E HumanEval?

3 models have been evaluated on the Multipl-E HumanEval benchmark, with 0 verified results and 3 self-reported results.

Where can I find the Multipl-E HumanEval paper?

The Multipl-E HumanEval paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.08227. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does Multipl-E HumanEval cover?

Multipl-E HumanEval is categorized under general and language. The benchmark evaluates text models with multilingual support.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all general
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
LiveCodeBench

LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.

general
71 models
IFEval

Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints

general
63 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

generalmultimodal
62 models