OmniBench
A novel multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate large language models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. Comprises 1,142 question-answer pairs covering 8 task categories from basic perception to complex inference, with a unique constraint that accurate responses require integrated understanding of all three modalities.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the OmniBench leaderboard with a score of 0.561 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What OmniBench measures
OmniBench is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.6, with the leader reaching 0.6.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- OmniBench: Towards The Future of Universal Omni-Language Models
- Authors
- Yizhi Li, Yinghao Ma, Ge Zhang, Ruibin Yuan, and 19 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2409.15272
Abstract
Recent advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have aimed to integrate and interpret data across diverse modalities. However, the capacity of these models to concurrently process and reason about multiple modalities remains underexplored, partly due to the lack of comprehensive modality-wise benchmarks. We introduce OmniBench, a novel benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate models' ability to recognize, interpret, and reason across visual, acoustic, and textual inputs simultaneously. We define language models capable of such tri-modal processing as the omni-language models (OLMs). OmniBench is distinguished by high-quality human annotations, ensuring that accurate responses require integrated understanding and reasoning across all three modalities. Our main findings reveal that: i) open-source OLMs exhibit critical limitations in instruction-following and reasoning capabilities within tri-modal contexts; and ii) most baselines models perform poorly (below 50% accuracy) even when provided with alternative textual representations of images or/and audio. These results suggest that the ability to construct a consistent context from text, image, and audio is often overlooked in existing MLLM training paradigms. To address this gap, we curate an instruction tuning dataset of 84.5K training samples, OmniInstruct, for training OLMs to adapt to tri-modal contexts. We advocate for future research to focus on developing more robust tri-modal integration techniques and training strategies to enhance OLMs. Codes, data and live leaderboard could be found at https://m-a-p.ai/OmniBench.
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads with 56.1%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OmniBench
OmniBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 7B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about OmniBench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions