OSWorld Extended
OSWorld is a scalable, real computer environment benchmark for evaluating multimodal agents on open-ended tasks across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. It comprises 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop applications, OS file I/O, and multi-application workflows. The benchmark evaluates agents' ability to interact with computer interfaces using screenshots and actions in realistic computing environments.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet from Anthropic currently leads the OSWorld Extended leaderboard with a score of 0.220 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What OSWorld Extended measures
OSWorld Extended is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on general, multimodal, reasoning, and agents tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.2, with the leader reaching 0.2.
Compare leaders on the best AI for general, best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for agents leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
- Authors
- Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, and 13 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2404.07972
Abstract
Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 22.0%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OSWorld Extended
OSWorld Extended Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about OSWorld Extended.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions