OSWorld Screenshot-only
OSWorld Screenshot-only: A variant of the OSWorld benchmark that evaluates multimodal AI agents using only screenshot observations to complete open-ended computer tasks across real operating systems (Ubuntu, Windows, macOS). Tests agents' ability to perform complex workflows involving web apps, desktop applications, file I/O, and multi-application tasks through visual interface understanding and GUI grounding.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet from Anthropic currently leads the OSWorld Screenshot-only leaderboard with a score of 0.149 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 14.9%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OSWorld Screenshot-only
OSWorld Screenshot-only Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 |
FAQ
Common questions about OSWorld Screenshot-only.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints