PathMCQA
PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.
MedGemma 4B IT from Google currently leads the PathMCQA leaderboard with a score of 0.698 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What PathMCQA measures
PathMCQA is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, reasoning, healthcare, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning, best AI for healthcare and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- PathMMU: A Massive Multimodal Expert-Level Benchmark for Understanding and Reasoning in Pathology
- Authors
- Yuxuan Sun, Hao Wu, Chenglu Zhu, Sunyi Zheng, and 10 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2401.16355
Abstract
The emergence of large multimodal models has unlocked remarkable potential in AI, particularly in pathology. However, the lack of specialized, high-quality benchmark impeded their development and precise evaluation. To address this, we introduce PathMMU, the largest and highest-quality expert-validated pathology benchmark for Large Multimodal Models (LMMs). It comprises 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images from various sources, each accompanied by an explanation for the correct answer. The construction of PathMMU harnesses GPT-4V's advanced capabilities, utilizing over 30,000 image-caption pairs to enrich captions and generate corresponding Q&As in a cascading process. Significantly, to maximize PathMMU's authority, we invite seven pathologists to scrutinize each question under strict standards in PathMMU's validation and test sets, while simultaneously setting an expert-level performance benchmark for PathMMU. We conduct extensive evaluations, including zero-shot assessments of 14 open-sourced and 4 closed-sourced LMMs and their robustness to image corruption. We also fine-tune representative LMMs to assess their adaptability to PathMMU. The empirical findings indicate that advanced LMMs struggle with the challenging PathMMU benchmark, with the top-performing LMM, GPT-4V, achieving only a 49.8% zero-shot performance, significantly lower than the 71.8% demonstrated by human pathologists. After fine-tuning, significantly smaller open-sourced LMMs can outperform GPT-4V but still fall short of the expertise shown by pathologists. We hope that the PathMMU will offer valuable insights and foster the development of more specialized, next-generation LMMs for pathology.
MedGemma 4B IT leads with 69.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on PathMCQA
PathMCQA Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google | 4B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about PathMCQA.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions