PathMCQA

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

MedGemma 4B IT from Google currently leads the PathMCQA leaderboard with a score of 0.698 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Paper

GoogleMedGemma 4B IT leads with 69.8%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on PathMCQA

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

PathMCQA Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
14B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about PathMCQA.

What is the PathMCQA benchmark?

PathMMU is a massive multimodal expert-level benchmark for understanding and reasoning in pathology, containing 33,428 multimodal multi-choice questions and 24,067 images validated by seven pathologists. It evaluates Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) performance on pathology tasks, with the top-performing model GPT-4V achieving only 49.8% zero-shot performance compared to 71.8% for human pathologists.

What is the PathMCQA leaderboard?

The PathMCQA leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MedGemma 4B IT by Google leads with a score of 0.698. The average score across all models is 0.698.

What is the highest PathMCQA score?

The highest PathMCQA score is 0.698, achieved by MedGemma 4B IT from Google.

How many models are evaluated on PathMCQA?

1 models have been evaluated on the PathMCQA benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the PathMCQA paper?

The PathMCQA paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16355. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does PathMCQA cover?

PathMCQA is categorized under healthcare, multimodal, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all healthcare
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

healthcare
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

healthcare
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models