Seal-0

Seal-0 is a benchmark for evaluating agentic search capabilities, testing models' ability to navigate and retrieve information using tools.

Kimi K2.5 from Moonshot AI currently leads the Seal-0 leaderboard with a score of 0.574 across 6 evaluated AI models.

Moonshot AIKimi K2.5 leads with 57.4%, followed by Moonshot AIKimi K2-Thinking-0905 at 56.3% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-27B at 47.2%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Seal-0

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

Seal-0 Leaderboard

6 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T
21.0T
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
397B262K$0.60 / $3.60
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about Seal-0.

What is the Seal-0 benchmark?

Seal-0 is a benchmark for evaluating agentic search capabilities, testing models' ability to navigate and retrieve information using tools.

What is the Seal-0 leaderboard?

The Seal-0 leaderboard ranks 6 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2.5 by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.574. The average score across all models is 0.489.

What is the highest Seal-0 score?

The highest Seal-0 score is 0.574, achieved by Kimi K2.5 from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on Seal-0?

6 models have been evaluated on the Seal-0 benchmark, with 0 verified results and 6 self-reported results.

What categories does Seal-0 cover?

Seal-0 is categorized under reasoning and search. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all reasoning
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models