STEM
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on STEM
STEM Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 7B | — | — |
What is STEM?
A comprehensive multimodal benchmark dataset with 448 skills and 1,073,146 questions spanning all STEM subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics), designed to test neural models' vision-language STEM skills based on K-12 curriculum. Unlike existing datasets that focus on expert-level ability, this dataset includes fundamental skills designed around educational standards.
STEM is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on math, multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.3, with the leader at 0.3.
Compare leaders on the best AI for math, best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Current leaders
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the STEM leaderboard with a score of 0.340 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- Measuring Vision-Language STEM Skills of Neural Models
- Authors
- Jianhao Shen, Ye Yuan, Srbuhi Mirzoyan, Ming Zhang, and 1 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2402.17205
Abstract
We introduce a new challenge to test the STEM skills of neural models. The problems in the real world often require solutions, combining knowledge from STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math). Unlike existing datasets, our dataset requires the understanding of multimodal vision-language information of STEM. Our dataset features one of the largest and most comprehensive datasets for the challenge. It includes 448 skills and 1,073,146 questions spanning all STEM subjects. Compared to existing datasets that often focus on examining expert-level ability, our dataset includes fundamental skills and questions designed based on the K-12 curriculum. We also add state-of-the-art foundation models such as CLIP and GPT-3.5-Turbo to our benchmark. Results show that the recent model advances only help master a very limited number of lower grade-level skills (2.5% in the third grade) in our dataset. In fact, these models are still well below (averaging 54.7%) the performance of elementary students, not to mention near expert-level performance. To understand and increase the performance on our dataset, we teach the models on a training split of our dataset. Even though we observe improved performance, the model performance remains relatively low compared to average elementary students. To solve STEM problems, we will need novel algorithmic innovations from the community.
FAQ
Common questions about the STEM benchmark and leaderboard.