SWE Atlas - Test Writing
SWE Atlas - Test Writing evaluates a model's ability to author meaningful tests for real-world software projects, measuring how well agents can understand code and produce correct, useful test coverage.
MiniMax M3 from MiniMax currently leads the SWE Atlas - Test Writing leaderboard with a score of 0.308 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What SWE Atlas - Test Writing measures
SWE Atlas - Test Writing is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on agents and code tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.3, with the leader reaching 0.3.
Compare leaders on the best AI for agents and best AI for code leaderboards.
MiniMax M3 leads with 30.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on SWE Atlas - Test Writing
SWE Atlas - Test Writing Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  MiniMax M3New MiniMax | — | 1.0M | $0.60 / $2.40 |
FAQ
Common questions about SWE Atlas - Test Writing.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics
BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.
Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving in software engineering that covers Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++. Contains 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators, designed to evaluate Large Language Models across diverse software ecosystems beyond Python.