SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts)
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts)
SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts) Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — |
What is SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts)?
SWE-bench Verified is a human-validated subset of 500 test samples from the original SWE-bench dataset that evaluates AI systems' ability to automatically resolve real GitHub issues in Python repositories. Given a codebase and issue description, models must edit the code to successfully resolve the problem, requiring understanding and coordination of changes across multiple functions, classes, and files. The Verified version provides more reliable evaluation through manual validation of test samples.
SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts) is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning leaderboards.
Current leaders
Kimi K2 Instruct from Moonshot AI currently leads the SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts) leaderboard with a score of 0.716 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?
- Authors
- Carlos E. Jimenez, John Yang, Alexander Wettig, Shunyu Yao, and 3 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2310.06770
Abstract
Language models have outpaced our ability to evaluate them effectively, but for their future development it is essential to study the frontier of their capabilities. We find real-world software engineering to be a rich, sustainable, and challenging testbed for evaluating the next generation of language models. To this end, we introduce SWE-bench, an evaluation framework consisting of $2,294$ software engineering problems drawn from real GitHub issues and corresponding pull requests across $12$ popular Python repositories. Given a codebase along with a description of an issue to be resolved, a language model is tasked with editing the codebase to address the issue. Resolving issues in SWE-bench frequently requires understanding and coordinating changes across multiple functions, classes, and even files simultaneously, calling for models to interact with execution environments, process extremely long contexts and perform complex reasoning that goes far beyond traditional code generation tasks. Our evaluations show that both state-of-the-art proprietary models and our fine-tuned model SWE-Llama can resolve only the simplest issues. The best-performing model, Claude 2, is able to solve a mere $1.96$% of the issues. Advances on SWE-bench represent steps towards LMs that are more practical, intelligent, and autonomous.
FAQ
Common questions about the SWE-bench Verified (Multiple Attempts) benchmark and leaderboard.