Tau-bench
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Tau-bench
Tau-bench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | StepFun | 196B | 66K | $0.10 / $0.40 | ||
| 2 | Zhipu AI | 358B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Xiaomi | 309B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Zhipu AI | 30B | — | — | ||
| 5 | MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 6 | OpenAI | — | — | — |
What is Tau-bench?
τ-bench: A benchmark for tool-agent-user interaction in real-world domains. Tests language agents' ability to interact with users and follow domain-specific rules through dynamic conversations using API tools and policy guidelines across retail and airline domains. Evaluates consistency and reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials.
Tau-bench is a text benchmark evaluating models on reasoning, general, agents, and tool calling tasks. LLM Stats tracks 6 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for general, best AI for agents and best AI for tool calling leaderboards.
Current leaders
Step-3.5-Flash from StepFun currently leads the Tau-bench leaderboard with a score of 0.882 across 6 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- $τ$-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domains
- Authors
- Shunyu Yao, Noah Shinn, Pedram Razavi, Karthik Narasimhan
- Published
- arXiv
- 2406.12045
Abstract
Existing benchmarks do not test language agents on their interaction with human users or ability to follow domain-specific rules, both of which are vital for deploying them in real world applications. We propose $τ$-bench, a benchmark emulating dynamic conversations between a user (simulated by language models) and a language agent provided with domain-specific API tools and policy guidelines. We employ an efficient and faithful evaluation process that compares the database state at the end of a conversation with the annotated goal state. We also propose a new metric (pass^k) to evaluate the reliability of agent behavior over multiple trials. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art function calling agents (like gpt-4o) succeed on <50% of the tasks, and are quite inconsistent (pass^8 <25% in retail). Our findings point to the need for methods that can improve the ability of agents to act consistently and follow rules reliably.
FAQ
Common questions about the Tau-bench benchmark and leaderboard.