VIBE-Pro

VIBE-Pro is an advanced version of the VIBE (Visual & Interactive Benchmark for Execution) benchmark that evaluates LLMs on professional-grade full-stack application development tasks. It measures model performance across complex real-world development scenarios including web, mobile, and backend applications with higher difficulty than the standard VIBE benchmark.

MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax currently leads the VIBE-Pro leaderboard with a score of 0.556 across 2 evaluated AI models.

MiniMaxMiniMax M2.7 leads with 55.6%, followed by MiniMaxMiniMax M2.5 at 54.2%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on VIBE-Pro

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

VIBE-Pro Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1205K$0.30 / $1.20
2230B1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about VIBE-Pro.

What is the VIBE-Pro benchmark?

VIBE-Pro is an advanced version of the VIBE (Visual & Interactive Benchmark for Execution) benchmark that evaluates LLMs on professional-grade full-stack application development tasks. It measures model performance across complex real-world development scenarios including web, mobile, and backend applications with higher difficulty than the standard VIBE benchmark.

What is the VIBE-Pro leaderboard?

The VIBE-Pro leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MiniMax M2.7 by MiniMax leads with a score of 0.556. The average score across all models is 0.549.

What is the highest VIBE-Pro score?

The highest VIBE-Pro score is 0.556, achieved by MiniMax M2.7 from MiniMax.

How many models are evaluated on VIBE-Pro?

2 models have been evaluated on the VIBE-Pro benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

What categories does VIBE-Pro cover?

VIBE-Pro is categorized under agents and code. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all agents
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

code
90 models
LiveCodeBench

LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.

code
71 models
HumanEval

A benchmark that measures functional correctness for synthesizing programs from docstrings, consisting of 164 original programming problems assessing language comprehension, algorithms, and simple mathematics

code
66 models
BrowseComp

BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.

agents
46 models
Terminal-Bench 2.0

Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

agents
40 models
SWE-bench Multilingual

A multilingual benchmark for issue resolving in software engineering that covers Java, TypeScript, JavaScript, Go, Rust, C, and C++. Contains 1,632 high-quality instances carefully annotated from 2,456 candidates by 68 expert annotators, designed to evaluate Large Language Models across diverse software ecosystems beyond Python.

code
27 models