VQAv2 (test)
VQA v2.0 (Visual Question Answering v2.0) is a balanced dataset designed to counter language priors in visual question answering. It consists of complementary image pairs where the same question yields different answers, forcing models to rely on visual understanding rather than language bias. The dataset contains 1,105,904 questions across 204,721 COCO images, requiring understanding of vision, language, and commonsense knowledge.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct from Meta currently leads the VQAv2 (test) leaderboard with a score of 0.752 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What VQAv2 (test) measures
VQAv2 (test) is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on image to text, multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.8, with the leader reaching 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for image to text, best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- Making the V in VQA Matter: Elevating the Role of Image Understanding in Visual Question Answering
- Authors
- Yash Goyal, Tejas Khot, Douglas Summers-Stay, Dhruv Batra, and 1 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 1612.00837
Abstract
Problems at the intersection of vision and language are of significant importance both as challenging research questions and for the rich set of applications they enable. However, inherent structure in our world and bias in our language tend to be a simpler signal for learning than visual modalities, resulting in models that ignore visual information, leading to an inflated sense of their capability. We propose to counter these language priors for the task of Visual Question Answering (VQA) and make vision (the V in VQA) matter! Specifically, we balance the popular VQA dataset by collecting complementary images such that every question in our balanced dataset is associated with not just a single image, but rather a pair of similar images that result in two different answers to the question. Our dataset is by construction more balanced than the original VQA dataset and has approximately twice the number of image-question pairs. Our complete balanced dataset is publicly available at www.visualqa.org as part of the 2nd iteration of the Visual Question Answering Dataset and Challenge (VQA v2.0). We further benchmark a number of state-of-art VQA models on our balanced dataset. All models perform significantly worse on our balanced dataset, suggesting that these models have indeed learned to exploit language priors. This finding provides the first concrete empirical evidence for what seems to be a qualitative sense among practitioners. Finally, our data collection protocol for identifying complementary images enables us to develop a novel interpretable model, which in addition to providing an answer to the given (image, question) pair, also provides a counter-example based explanation. Specifically, it identifies an image that is similar to the original image, but it believes has a different answer to the same question. This can help in building trust for machines among their users.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct leads with 75.2%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on VQAv2 (test)
VQAv2 (test) Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about VQAv2 (test).
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions