We-Math

We-Math evaluates multimodal models on visual mathematical reasoning, requiring models to understand and solve math problems presented with visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and geometric figures.

Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the We-Math leaderboard with a score of 0.890 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6 Plus leads with 89.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on We-Math

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

We-Math Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about We-Math.

What is the We-Math benchmark?

We-Math evaluates multimodal models on visual mathematical reasoning, requiring models to understand and solve math problems presented with visual elements such as diagrams, charts, and geometric figures.

What is the We-Math leaderboard?

The We-Math leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.890. The average score across all models is 0.890.

What is the highest We-Math score?

The highest We-Math score is 0.890, achieved by Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on We-Math?

1 models have been evaluated on the We-Math benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does We-Math cover?

We-Math is categorized under vision, math, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all vision
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
75 models