Wild Bench

WildBench is an automated evaluation framework that benchmarks large language models using 1,024 challenging, real-world tasks selected from over one million human-chatbot conversation logs. It introduces two evaluation metrics (WB-Reward and WB-Score) that achieve high correlation with human preferences and uses task-specific checklists for systematic evaluation.

Mistral Large 3 from Mistral AI currently leads the Wild Bench leaderboard with a score of 0.685 across 8 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Mistral AIMistral Large 3 leads with 68.5%, followed by Mistral AIMiniStral 3 (14B Instruct 2512) at 68.5% and Mistral AIMinistral 3 (8B Instruct 2512) at 66.8%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Wild Bench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

Wild Bench Leaderboard

8 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
675B128K$2.00 / $5.00
114B
38B
424B
53B
624B32K$0.07 / $0.14
7398B256K$2.00 / $8.00
852B256K$0.20 / $0.40
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about Wild Bench.

What is the Wild Bench benchmark?

WildBench is an automated evaluation framework that benchmarks large language models using 1,024 challenging, real-world tasks selected from over one million human-chatbot conversation logs. It introduces two evaluation metrics (WB-Reward and WB-Score) that achieve high correlation with human preferences and uses task-specific checklists for systematic evaluation.

What is the Wild Bench leaderboard?

The Wild Bench leaderboard ranks 8 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Mistral Large 3 by Mistral AI leads with a score of 0.685. The average score across all models is 0.586.

What is the highest Wild Bench score?

The highest Wild Bench score is 0.685, achieved by Mistral Large 3 from Mistral AI.

How many models are evaluated on Wild Bench?

8 models have been evaluated on the Wild Bench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 8 self-reported results.

Where can I find the Wild Bench paper?

The Wild Bench paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04770. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does Wild Bench cover?

Wild Bench is categorized under communication, general, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all communication
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models