Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Devstral Small 1.1

Devstral Small 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Devstral Small 1.1 is 10.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Devstral Small 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-Bench Verified).

Devstral Small 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Devstral Small 1.1 costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1 ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Devstral Small 1.1.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Devstral Small 1.1

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerMistral

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Devstral Small 1.1's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Devstral Small 1.1 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Devstral Small 1.1

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Devstral Small 1.1 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Devstral Small 1.1

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Devstral Small 1.1 was released on 2025-07-11.

Devstral Small 1.1 is 9 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

Devstral Small 1.1

Jul 11, 2025

10 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Devstral Small 1.1 is available from Mistral AI.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Devstral Small 1.1

Mistral

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Devstral Small 1.1

View details

Mistral AI

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (53.6% vs 40.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.5 Haiku	Devstral Small 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Devstral Small 1.1.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Devstral Small 1.1?

Devstral Small 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Devstral Small 1.1 is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Devstral Small 1.1 in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Devstral Small 1.1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 53.6%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Devstral Small 1.1?

Devstral Small 1.1 is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Devstral Small 1.1 costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Devstral Small 1.1?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Devstral Small 1.1 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Devstral Small 1.1?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Devstral Small 1.1?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Devstral Small 1.1 is developed by Mistral AI.