Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteWhich is better in 2026?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 9.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite — which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

On price, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 9.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite if…

  • cost matters — it's about 9.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite uses Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2025-06-17.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 8 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jun 17, 2025

12 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (40.6% vs 31.6%)
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (64.6% vs 41.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Google
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores FACTS Grounding: 84.1%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 81.1%, MMMU: 72.9%, GPQA: 64.6%, Vibe-Eval: 51.3%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google.

Related comparisons