Model Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4 TurboWhich is better in 2026?
GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is 9.4x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4 Turbo — which is better?
Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and GPT-4 Turbo (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 4 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, MATH, MGSM). GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is roughly 9.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude 3.5 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
- cost matters — it's about 9.4x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
Choose GPT-4 Turbo if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 5 shared benchmarks
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (HumanEval), while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 4 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, MATH, MGSM).
GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 7.5x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 7 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.
Oct 22, 2024
1.6 years ago
6mo newerApr 9, 2024
2.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.
—
Dec 2023
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
GPT-4 Turbo
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.5 Haiku
View detailsAnthropic
GPT-4 Turbo
View detailsOpenAI
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4 Turbo.