Make AI phone calls with one API call

Start for free

Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is 2.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified), while GPT-4o is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail).

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

Start for freeRead the docs
$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 3.1x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Apr 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 3 months newer than GPT-4o.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

2mo newer
GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (40.6% vs 33.2%)
OpenAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 41.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (74.7% vs 65.0%)
Higher TAU-bench Airline score (42.8% vs 22.8%)
Higher TAU-bench Retail score (60.3% vs 51.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs GPT-4o

GPT-4o significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. GPT-4o scores AI2D: 94.2%, DocVQA: 92.8%, ChartQA: 85.7%, MMLU: 85.7%, CharXiv-D: 85.3%.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 3.1x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $2.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4o is developed by OpenAI.