Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 3.2 90B Instruct Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 3.2 90B Instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM).

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Mar 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri Mar 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Input tokens$0.35

Output tokens$0.40

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 90B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Fri Mar 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct uses Llama 3.2.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.2

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 1 month newer than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

3w newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Sep 25, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Bedrock, Fireworks, Together, Hyperbolic. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.