Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Llama 4 Maverick is 5.8x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Llama 4 Maverick is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM, MMLU-Pro).

Llama 4 Maverick shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Maverick costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.17/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Llama 4 Maverick.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Llama 4 Maverick

Input tokens$0.17

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Maverick accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Llama 4 Maverick can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is limited to 200,000 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Llama 4 Maverick

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output1,000,000 tokens

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Llama 4 Maverick can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 4 Maverick

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Maverick uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Llama 4 Maverick was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Maverick is 6 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

Llama 4 Maverick

Apr 5, 2025

1.1 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Llama 4 Maverick is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Lambda, Groq, Fireworks, Together, Sambanova.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Llama 4 Maverick

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.88/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.85/1M

Sambanova

Input Price:Input: $0.63/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.79/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

Higher MATH score (69.4% vs 61.2%)

Llama 4 Maverick

View details

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.5 Haiku	Llama 4 Maverick

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Maverick.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Llama 4 Maverick is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Llama 4 Maverick in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Llama 4 Maverick scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 92.3%, ChartQA: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.5%, MMLU-Pro: 80.5%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick?

Llama 4 Maverick is 4.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Llama 4 Maverick costs $0.17/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Llama 4 Maverick supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 4 Maverick?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.17/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 4 Community License Agreement). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 4 Maverick?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Llama 4 Maverick is developed by Meta.