Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 4 Scout Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama 4 Scout across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MATH), while Llama 4 Scout is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM, MMLU-Pro).

Llama 4 Scout shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Llama 4 Scout costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.08/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Llama 4 Scout ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Llama 4 Scout.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Llama 4 Scout

Input tokens$0.08

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Llama 4 Scout accepts 10,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Llama 4 Scout can generate longer responses up to 10,000,000 tokens, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is limited to 200,000 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Llama 4 Scout

Input10,000,000 tokens

Output10,000,000 tokens

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Llama 4 Scout supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Llama 4 Scout can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Llama 4 Scout

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 4 Scout uses Llama 4 Community License Agreement.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05.

Llama 4 Scout is 6 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

11 months ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Llama 4 Scout is available from DeepInfra, Lambda, Novita, Groq, Fireworks, Together. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.