The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QvQ-72B-Preview

Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched at 5.2 and 7.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 5.2 and 7.9.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.2
#304
7.9
#288
5.4
#300
8.2
#281
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Haiku
QvQ-72B-Preview
10.6#250
9.6#254
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

QvQ-72B-Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

QvQ-72B-Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 2 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or QvQ-72B-Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 5.2 and 7.9. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.2 vs 7.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.