Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct — which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro). Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jul 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Jul 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 4 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.3 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (46.0% vs 41.6%)
Higher HumanEval score (91.5% vs 88.1%)
Higher MATH score (82.2% vs 69.4%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (68.8% vs 65.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons