Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 1.6x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail).

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Input tokens$0.30

Output tokens$3.00

Best providerFireworks

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Input262,144 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Sat May 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 9 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

9 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher GPQA score (81.1% vs 41.6%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (84.4% vs 65.0%)

Higher TAU-bench Airline score (46.0% vs 22.8%)

Higher TAU-bench Retail score (67.8% vs 51.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.5 Haiku	Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.