Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 7 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun May 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-06-21, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 11 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Jun 21, 2024

1.9 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (93.1% vs 52.9%)
Higher DROP score (87.1% vs 60.8%)
Higher GPQA score (59.4% vs 23.7%)
Higher HumanEval score (92.0% vs 75.0%)
Higher MGSM score (91.6% vs 60.7%)
Higher MMLU score (90.4% vs 64.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (76.1% vs 50.6%)
Google
Has open weights
AnthropicClaude 3.5 Sonnet
GoogleGemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%, HumanEval: 92.0%, MGSM: 91.6%, MMLU: 90.4%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.