Model Comparison
Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 nanoWhich is better in 2026?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT-4.1 nano is 34.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 nano — which is better?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (by Anthropic) and GPT-4.1 nano (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU), while GPT-4.1 nano is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, GPT-4.1 nano is roughly 34.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-4.1 nano also accepts a larger context window (1,047,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
Choose GPT-4.1 nano if…
- cost matters — it's about 34.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,047,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU), while GPT-4.1 nano is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-4.1 nano accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4.1 nano is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 nano support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
GPT-4.1 nano
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-06-21, while GPT-4.1 nano was released on 2025-04-14.
GPT-4.1 nano is 10 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Jun 21, 2024
2.0 years ago
Apr 14, 2025
1.2 years ago
9mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-4.1 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-4.1 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.
—
May 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Bedrock, Google. GPT-4.1 nano is available from OpenAI.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
GPT-4.1 nano
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
View detailsAnthropic
GPT-4.1 nano
View detailsOpenAI
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 nano.