The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok-3

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3 cost the same.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window

Choose Grok-3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$3.00 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
200,000
128,000
Released
Jun 2024
Feb 2025
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3 cost the same.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
xAI
Grok-3
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Grok-3's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-3
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-06-21, while Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17.

Grok-3 is 8 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Jun 21, 2024

2.2 years ago

Grok-3

Feb 17, 2025

1.5 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Grok-3

Nov 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Bedrock, Google. Grok-3 is available from xAI.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Grok-3

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Grok-3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok-3.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok-3?

Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Grok-3 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Grok-3 in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%, HumanEval: 92.0%, MGSM: 91.6%, MMLU: 90.4%. Grok-3 scores AIME 2024: 93.3%, AIME 2025: 93.3%, GPQA: 84.6%, LiveCodeBench: 79.4%, MMMU: 78.0%.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Grok-3?

Both models cost $3.00 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Grok-3 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Grok-3?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Grok-3 is developed by xAI.