Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

11 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 9 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, DocVQA, MathVista, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail), while GPT-4o is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU).

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Mar 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT-4o costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 1.2x more expensive than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more expensive than GPT-4o.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sun Mar 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-08-06.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 3 months newer than GPT-4o.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

2mo newer
GPT-4o

Aug 6, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher AI2D score (94.7% vs 94.2%)
Higher ChartQA score (90.8% vs 85.7%)
Higher DocVQA score (95.2% vs 92.8%)
Higher MathVista score (67.7% vs 61.4%)
Higher MMLU score (90.4% vs 85.7%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (77.6% vs 74.7%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (49.0% vs 33.2%)
Higher TAU-bench Airline score (46.0% vs 42.8%)
Higher TAU-bench Retail score (69.2% vs 60.3%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (70.1% vs 67.2%)
Higher MMMU score (72.2% vs 68.3%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
OpenAI
GPT-4o