Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Hermes 3 70B Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Hermes 3 70B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Hermes 3 70B costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 8.6x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($0.35/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 10.7x more expensive than Hermes 3 70B ($1.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more expensive than Hermes 3 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$1.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input131,072 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hermes 3 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Hermes 3 70B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 2 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

2mo newer
Hermes 3 70B

Aug 15, 2024

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Hermes 3 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (67.2% vs 66.1%)
Higher MATH score (78.3% vs 20.8%)
Higher MMLU score (90.4% vs 79.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (77.6% vs 47.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B