The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Mini

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 19.3 to -4.0.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.3 to -4.0, ranking #195 overall.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.3 and ranks #195 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 7 exact shared results

Choose Phi 4 Mini

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.3
#195
-4.0
#334
20.3
#178
-4.1
#327
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
7 of 7
0 of 7
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Phi 4 Mini
23.4#124
2.7#282
23.6#65
1.6#181
23.6#54
1.6#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 17 for Phi 4 Mini

7 shared

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 7 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, GSM8k, MATH, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Phi 4 Mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Phi 4 Mini was released on 2025-02-01.

Phi 4 Mini is 3 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Phi 4 Mini

Feb 1, 2025

1.6 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Phi 4 Mini

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Mini.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Phi 4 Mini?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 19.3 to -4.0. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Phi 4 Mini in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. Phi 4 Mini scores GSM8k: 88.6%, ARC-C: 83.7%, BoolQ: 81.2%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%, PIQA: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Mini supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.3 vs -4.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini is developed by Microsoft.