Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMLU).

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-03-03.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is 12 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.0 years ago

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Mar 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is available from Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (86.9% vs 84.8%)
Higher MMMLU score (88.9% vs 86.1%)
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Google
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite