Model Comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 4.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 2.7x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input tokens$3.00

Output tokens$15.00

Best providerAnthropic

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Input tokens$20.00

Output tokens$40.00

Best providerTogether

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Input200,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Input32,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Sat May 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 4 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Together

Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Higher AIME 2025 score (54.8% vs 11.6%)

Higher GPQA score (84.8% vs 23.7%)

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

View details

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.7 Sonnet	Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 6.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 32K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.