Model Comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1-mini

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1-mini is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH-500), while o1-mini is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o1-mini costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) costs the same as o1-mini ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than o1-mini ($12.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than o1-mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 31 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to o1-mini's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while o1-mini is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Tue Mar 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-mini does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o1-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 6 months newer than o1-mini.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.1 years ago

5mo newer
o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. o1-mini is available from OpenAI, Azure.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

o1-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $3.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $13.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (84.8% vs 60.0%)
Higher MATH-500 score (96.2% vs 90.0%)
OpenAI
Less expensive output tokens
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
OpenAIo1-mini
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
OpenAI
o1-mini

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs o1-mini

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and o1-mini is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%.
Both models cost $3.00 per million input tokens.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and o1-mini supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and o1-mini is developed by OpenAI.