Model Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 5.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking — which is better?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (by Anthropic) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet if…
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking if…
- cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($0.45/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 4.3x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking ($3.49/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 7 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
Feb 24, 2025
1.3 years ago
Sep 22, 2025
9 months ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is available from DeepInfra, Novita.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
View detailsAnthropic
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingDetailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.