Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4 Comparison
Comparing Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DROP), while Phi 4 is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU).
Phi 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 does not.
Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3 Haiku
Phi 4
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.
Phi 4 is 9 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.
Mar 13, 2024
2.0 years ago
Dec 12, 2024
1.3 years ago
9mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.
—
Jun 2024
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Haiku
View detailsAnthropic
Phi 4
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|