The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Claude 3 Opus leads the LLM Stats Score 10.4 to -2.4.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Opus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 10.4 to -2.4, ranking #246 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3 Opus wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Opus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 10.4 and ranks #246 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
10.4
#246
-2.4
#320
10.3
#240
-2.0
#310
5.2
#187
-4.5
#241
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Opus
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
16.4#193
5.7#255
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 4 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

1 shared

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is 11 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.5 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Opus
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Opus leads the LLM Stats Score 10.4 to -2.4. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.4 vs -2.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek.