The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Claude 3 Opus leads the LLM Stats Score 9.9 to -3.0.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Opus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 9.9 to -3.0, ranking #273 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3 Opus wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Opus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 9.9 and ranks #273 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.9
#273
-3.0
#348
9.8
#267
-2.6
#338
5.1
#208
-4.6
#265
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Opus
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
16.1#211
5.4#272
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 4 for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

1 shared

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is 11 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.6 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Opus
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Opus leads the LLM Stats Score 9.9 to -3.0. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.9 vs -3.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek.