Model Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E2B

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, HellaSwag), while Gemma 3n E2B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed May 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B is 16 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

10 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Opus

—

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (96.4% vs 51.7%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (86.8% vs 44.3%)
Higher DROP score (83.1% vs 53.9%)
Higher HellaSwag score (95.4% vs 72.2%)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Google
Gemma 3n E2B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google.