Model Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 9 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, GPQA, HellaSwag, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon May 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is 15 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

1.0 years ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Opus

—

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher ARC-C score (96.4% vs 51.7%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (86.8% vs 44.3%)
Higher DROP score (83.1% vs 53.9%)
Higher GPQA score (50.4% vs 24.8%)
Higher HellaSwag score (95.4% vs 72.2%)
Higher HumanEval score (84.9% vs 66.5%)
Higher MGSM score (90.7% vs 53.1%)
Higher MMLU score (86.8% vs 60.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (68.5% vs 40.5%)
Google
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Google
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google.