Model Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 1.2x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 5 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 1.9x more expensive than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3 Opus

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$75.00

Best providerAnthropic

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Input tokens$20.00

Output tokens$40.00

Best providerTogether

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Opus accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Claude 3 Opus

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Input32,000 tokens

Output32,000 tokens

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is 16 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.2 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

11 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Opus

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Claude 3 Opus

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Together

Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3 Opus

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Higher GPQA score (50.4% vs 23.7%)

Higher HumanEval score (84.9% vs 75.0%)

Higher MGSM score (90.7% vs 67.0%)

Higher MMLU score (86.8% vs 64.9%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (68.5% vs 50.6%)

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

View details

Google

Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3 Opus	Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Claude 3 Opus cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3 Opus is 1.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Opus costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 32K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.