Claude 3 Opus vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct Comparison
Comparing Claude 3 Opus and Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 10 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, GSM8k, HellaSwag, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.
Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3 Opus
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23.
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is 6 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Feb 29, 2024
2.0 years ago
Aug 23, 2024
1.6 years ago
5mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Opus
View detailsAnthropic
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|