Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 12.2. Gemini 1.5 Pro is 4.6x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude Fable 5.1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 54.8 to 12.2, ranking #5 overall.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Pro is roughly 4.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Pro also accepts a larger context window (2,097,152 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude Fable 5.1
- overall performance matters — it scores 54.8 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
Choose Gemini 1.5 Pro
- cost matters — it's about 4.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 2,097,152 token context window
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
7 reported for Claude Fable 5.1 · 23 for Gemini 1.5 Pro
Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 1.5 Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Fable 5.1 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Fable 5.1 is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Pro accepts 2,097,152 input tokens compared to Claude Fable 5.1's 1,000,000 tokens. Claude Fable 5.1 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Pro is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 1.5 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Fable 5.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5.1 was released on 2026-09-01, while Gemini 1.5 Pro was released on 2024-05-01.
Claude Fable 5.1 is 28 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Pro.
Sep 1, 2026
1 days ago
2.3yr newerMay 1, 2024
2.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-11-01, while Claude Fable 5.1's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Pro's training data extends to 2023-11-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude Fable 5.1's cutoff date.
—
Nov 2023
Provider Availability
Claude Fable 5.1 is available from Anthropic. Gemini 1.5 Pro is available from Google.
Claude Fable 5.1
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5.1 and Gemini 1.5 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5.1 vs Gemini 1.5 Pro.