Model Comparison
Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?
Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is 10.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?
Claude Fable 5 (by Anthropic) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Finance Agent v2). Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Muse Spark 1.1 is roughly 10.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Fable 5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 6 shared benchmarks
Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…
- cost matters — it's about 10.0x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Fable 5 outperforms in 5 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Humanity's Last Exam, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 1 benchmark (Finance Agent v2).
Claude Fable 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Fable 5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 8.0x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Fable 5 ($50.00/1M tokens) is 11.8x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Fable 5 is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Fable 5's 1,000,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Fable 5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Fable 5 and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Fable 5
Muse Spark 1.1
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Fable 5 was released on 2026-06-09, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.
Muse Spark 1.1 is 1 month newer than Claude Fable 5.
Jun 9, 2026
1 months ago
Jul 9, 2026
4 weeks ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude Fable 5 is available from Anthropic. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.
Claude Fable 5
Muse Spark 1.1
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Fable 5
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude Fable 5 and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Fable 5 vs Muse Spark 1.1.