Model Comparison
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 FlashWhich is better in 2026?
Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash is 7.6x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash — which is better?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (by Anthropic) and Gemini 1.5 Flash (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemini 1.5 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash is roughly 7.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2025
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash if…
- cost matters — it's about 7.6x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemini 1.5 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 8.3x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200,000 tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemini 1.5 Flash support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Gemini 1.5 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Gemini 1.5 Flash was released on 2024-05-01.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is 18 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash.
Oct 15, 2025
8 months ago
1.5yr newerMay 1, 2024
2.1 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Claude Haiku 4.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Gemini 1.5 Flash has a cutoff of 2023-11-01.
Claude Haiku 4.5 has more recent training data (up to 2025-02-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.5 Flash (2023-11-01).
Feb 2025
1.3 yr newerNov 2023
Provider Availability
Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic, Vertex AI. Gemini 1.5 Flash is available from Google.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Gemini 1.5 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude Haiku 4.5
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash.