Model Comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemma 3 27B

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3 27B is 16.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Haiku 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemma 3 27B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu May 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Haiku 4.5 ($5.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Haiku 4.5 is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu May 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input tokens$1.00

Output tokens$5.00

Best providerAnthropic

Gemma 3 27B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.20

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Gemma 3 27B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Input200,000 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

Gemma 3 27B

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Thu May 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemma 3 27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Gemma 3 27B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Haiku 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Haiku 4.5 was released on 2025-10-15, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is 7 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Oct 15, 2025

7 months ago

7mo newer

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Haiku 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Haiku 4.5's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Feb 2025

Gemma 3 27B

—

Provider Availability

Claude Haiku 4.5 is available from Anthropic, Vertex AI. Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita.

Claude Haiku 4.5

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Unknown Organization

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Gemma 3 27B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude Haiku 4.5

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Higher GPQA score (73.0% vs 42.4%)

Gemma 3 27B

View details

Google

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude Haiku 4.5	Gemma 3 27B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Gemma 3 27B.

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Gemma 3 27B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Haiku 4.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3 27B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude Haiku 4.5 compare to Gemma 3 27B in benchmarks?

Claude Haiku 4.5 scores Tau2 Retail: 83.2%, MMMLU: 83.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 83.0%, AIME 2025: 80.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.3%. Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%.

Is Claude Haiku 4.5 cheaper than Gemma 3 27B?

Gemma 3 27B is 10.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00/M input and $5.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemma 3 27B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemma 3 27B?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($1.00 vs $0.10/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 and Gemma 3 27B?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google.